Monday, March 23, 2015
Tweet[IWS] CRS: U.S. MANUFACTURING IN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE [17 March 2015]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies-----------------Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor--------------------Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
NOTE: Funding for this service ends on 31 March 2015. Postings will end on this date as well.
Congressional Research Service (CRS)
U.S. Manufacturing in International Perspective
Marc Levinson, Section Research Manager
March 17, 2015
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42135.pdf
[full-text, 22 pages]
Summary
The health of the U.S. manufacturing sector has long been of great concern to Congress. The
decline in manufacturing employment since the start of the 21st century has stimulated particular
congressional interest. The Obama Administration has undertaken a variety of related initiatives,
and Members have introduced hundreds of bills intended to support domestic manufacturing
activity in various ways. The proponents of such measures frequently contend that the United
States is by various measures falling behind other countries in manufacturing, and they argue that
this relative decline can be mitigated or reversed by government policy.
This report is designed to inform the debate over the health of U.S. manufacturing through a
series of charts and tables that depict the position of the United States relative to other countries
according to various metrics. Understanding which trends in manufacturing reflect factors that
may be unique to the United States and which are related to broader changes in technology or
consumer preferences may be helpful in formulating policies intended to aid firms or workers
engaged in manufacturing activity. This report does not describe or discuss specific policy
options.
The main findings are the following:
• China displaced the United States as the largest manufacturing country in 2010,
as the United States’ share of global manufacturing activity declined from 30% in
2002 to 17.4% in 2012.
• Manufacturing output has grown more rapidly in the United States over the past
decade than in most European countries and Japan, although it has lagged China,
Korea, and other countries in Asia.
• Employment in manufacturing has fallen in most major manufacturing countries
over the past two decades. The United States saw a disproportionately large drop
between 2000 and 2010, but its decline in manufacturing employment since 1990
is in line with the changes in several European countries and Japan.
• U.S. manufacturers spend far more on research and development (R&D) than
those in any other country, but manufacturers’ R&D spending is rising more
rapidly in China, Korea, and Taiwan.
• Manufacturers in all major manufacturing countries appear to be spending
increasing amounts on R&D, relative to their value added. U.S. manufacturers
spend approximately 11% of value added on R&D, an increase of approximately
three percentage points since the 2000-2002 period. A very large proportion of
U.S. manufacturers’ R&D takes place in high-technology sectors, particularly
pharmaceutical, electronics, and aircraft manufacturing, whereas in most other
countries a far greater proportion of manufacturers’ R&D outlays occur in
medium-technology sectors such as motor vehicle and machinery manufacturing.
Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
How the U.S. Manufacturing Sector Ranks ..................................................................................... 2
The Role of Services in Manufacturing ........................................................................................... 8
Manufacturing Work ...................................................................................................................... 10
Technology and Research in Manufacturing ................................................................................. 15
Figures
Figure 1. Leading Countries, Value Added in Manufacturing ......................................................... 3
Figure 2. Selected Countries’ Shares of Manufacturing Value Added ............................................. 4
Figure 3. Share of Manufacturing in National Economies .............................................................. 5
Figure 4. Change in Value Added in Manufacturing, 2005-2013 .................................................... 6
Figure 5. Domestic Value in Exports of Transport Equipment ........................................................ 7
Figure 6. Domestic Value in Exports of Electrical and Optical Equipment..................................... 7
Figure 7. Investment in Manufacturing Fixed Capital as Share of GDP, 2013 ................................ 8
Figure 8. Service-Sector Inputs into Manufacturing Exports ........................................................ 10
Figure 9. Manufacturing Employment ........................................................................................... 11
Figure 10. Manufacturing Employment ......................................................................................... 11
Figure 11. Real Output per Labor Hour in Manufacturing ............................................................ 12
Figure 12. R&D in Manufacturing, 2013 ...................................................................................... 16
Figure 13. Growth in Manufacturing R&D ................................................................................... 16
Figure 14. Manufacturing R&D as Share of Manufacturing Value Added .................................... 17
Tables
Table 1. Hourly Compensation Costs in Manufacturing................................................................ 14
Table 2. Hourly Compensation Costs in Selected Manufacturing Industries ................................ 15
Table 3. Comparative Research and Development Spending by Industry ..................................... 18
Table 4. Manufacturers’ R&D Spending by Sector, 2011 .............................................................. 18
Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 19
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.