Wednesday, February 18, 2015
Tweet[IWS] CRS: UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN FROM CENTRAL AMERICA: FOREIGN POLICY CONSIDERATIONS [10 February 2015]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies-----------------Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor--------------------Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
This service is supported, in part, by donations. Please consider making a donation by following the instructions at http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/iws/news-bureau/support.html
Congressional Research Service (CRS)
Unaccompanied Children from Central America: Foreign Policy Considerations
Peter J. Meyer, Coordinator, Analyst in Latin American Affairs
Clare Ribando Seelke, Specialist in Latin American Affairs
Maureen Taft-Morales, Specialist in Latin American Affairs
Rhoda Margesson, Specialist in International Humanitarian Policy
February 10, 2015
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R43702.pdf
[full-text, 28 pages]
Summary
In FY2014, there was a sharp increase in the number of unaccompanied alien children (UAC)
traveling to the United States. U.S. authorities apprehended more than 68,500 unaccompanied
minors at the U.S. border in FY2014, 75% of whom came from El Salvador, Guatemala, and
Honduras—the “northern triangle” of Central America. This unexpected surge of children
strained U.S. government resources and created a complex crisis with humanitarian implications
for the United States and the international community. Although the flow of unaccompanied
minors has slowed since peaking in June 2014, experts warn that it will likely accelerate again in
the future unless policy makers in the countries of origin and the international community take
steps to address the poor socioeconomic and security conditions driving Central Americans to
leave their homes.
The 2014 crisis led to renewed focus on Central America, a region with which the United States
historically has shared close political, economic, and cultural ties. The United States currently
engages with Central American countries through a variety of mechanisms, including the
Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) and
several foreign assistance programs. Over the past year, the Obama Administration has sought
closer cooperation with Central American governments to dissuade children from making the
journey to the United States, target smuggling networks, and repatriate unauthorized migrants.
Asserting that the FY2014 surge in unaccompanied minors was a reminder that “the security and
prosperity of Central America are inextricably linked to our own,” the Administration has
requested $1 billion in foreign assistance for the region in FY2016. These funds would be used to
implement a new “U.S. Strategy for Engagement in Central America,” a whole-of-government
approach designed to increase economic opportunity, reduce extreme violence, and strengthen the
effectiveness of state institutions in Central America. The request would allow existing programs
to be scaled up significantly and would place greater emphasis on economic prosperity and
governance while continuing to address security concerns in the region.
The 113th Congress expressed considerable concern about the spike in apprehensions of
unaccompanied children from Central America, with Members holding numerous hearings,
traveling to the region, and introducing legislation. Although Congress opted not to appropriate
supplemental funding for programs in Central America in FY2014, it included additional
resources for the region in its FY2015 appropriations measure (P.L. 113-235). Congress also
directed the Administration to develop a comprehensive strategy to address the key factors
contributing to the migration of unaccompanied children to the United States.
The 114th Congress will continue to shape U.S. policy toward Central America. It will consider
the Administration’s $1 billion FY2016 request for the region and will review the strategy
required by P.L. 113-235. Congress also may consider other measures, such as H.R. 439 (Weber)
and H.R. 530 (Burgess), which, respectively, would suspend and reduce foreign assistance to El
Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico if those countries proved unwilling or unable to
prevent unauthorized migration to the United States.
As Congress continues to debate legislative options to address the foreign policy dimensions of
the situation, there are a variety of interrelated issues that it might take into consideration. These
might include Central American governments’ limited capacities to receive and reintegrate
repatriated children, and their abilities and willingness to address the pervasive insecurity and
lack of socioeconomic opportunities in their countries that cause many children to leave. Other
issues Congress might consider include the extent to which the Mexican government is capable of
limiting the transmigration of Central Americans through its territory and how international
humanitarian actors are responding to the situation in Central America.
For more information, see:
• CRS Report R43628, Unaccompanied Alien Children: Potential Factors Contributing to Recent Immigration;
• CRS Report R41731, Central America Regional Security Initiative: Background and Policy Issues for Congress;
• CRS Report R43616, El Salvador: Background and U.S. Relations;
• CRS Report R42580, Guatemala: Political, Security, and Socio-Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations; and
• CRS Report RL34027, Honduras: Background and U.S. Relations.
Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
U.S. Policy in Central America ........................................................................................................ 3
Background................................................................................................................................ 3
Current Policy Framework ........................................................................................................ 5
U.S. Response to Surge in Unaccompanied Minors .................................................................. 8
Obama Administration’s Initial Response ........................................................................... 8
FY2015 Appropriations Legislation .................................................................................. 10
FY2016 Administration Request ....................................................................................... 11
Policy Considerations .................................................................................................................... 13
Central American Capacity to Receive and Reintegrate Deportees ........................................ 13
Central American Capacity to Address Root Causes ............................................................... 16
Role of Mexico as a Transit Country ....................................................................................... 19
Selected International Humanitarian Efforts ........................................................................... 21
Outlook .......................................................................................................................................... 23
Figures
Figure 1. Apprehensions of Unaccompanied Minors by Country of Origin: FY2009-FY2014 ................... 1
Figure 2. Map of Central America ................................................................................................... 3
Figure 3. U.S. Assistance to El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras: FY1946-FY2012 ................ 4
Figure 4. U.S. Aid to Central America: FY2014 and FY2016 Request ......................................... 12
Tables
Table 1. U.S. Assistance to Central America: FY2013-FY2015 ...................................................... 6
Table 2. U.S. Assistance for Central America in the FY2016 Request .......................................... 13
Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 24
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.