Wednesday, September 10, 2014
Tweet[IWS] CRS: UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN FROM CENTRAL AMERICA: FOREIGN POLICY CONSIDERATIONS [28 August 2014]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies-----------------Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor--------------------Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
This service is supported, in part, by donations. Please consider making a donation by following the instructions at http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/iws/news-bureau/support.html
Congressional Research Service (CRS)
Unaccompanied Children from Central America: Foreign Policy Considerations
Peter J. Meyer, Coordinator, Analyst in Latin American Affairs
Clare Ribando Seelke, Specialist in Latin American Affairs
Maureen Taft-Morales, Specialist in Latin American Affairs
Rhoda Margesson, Specialist in International Humanitarian Policy
August 28, 2014
http://fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R43702.pdf
[full-text, 24 pages]
Summary
In recent months, U.S. policy makers have expressed concerns about a significant increase in the
number of unaccompanied alien children (UAC) being apprehended at the U.S. border. More than
63,000 such children were apprehended over the first 10 months of the fiscal year—a 100%
increase compared to same time period of FY2013. This unexpected surge of children has
strained U.S. government resources and created a complex crisis with humanitarian implications
for the United States and the international community. Although the flow of unaccompanied
minors appears to have slowed since July, experts warn it may accelerate again after the summer
heat passes.
Children from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras—the “northern triangle” of Central
America—account for the vast majority of those apprehended this fiscal year. While there is no
consensus regarding why exactly they left their homes, most analysts maintain that the problem is
complex, involving interactions between so-called “push factors” such as high levels of violence
and poverty in Central America and “pull factors” such as the desire to join family members in
the United States and perceptions about U.S. immigration policies. Given the diversity of the
unaccompanied children and their motives, the lines of distinction between and among refugees,
asylum seekers, and migrants are not always clear.
The surge in unaccompanied children from Central America has led to renewed focus on a region
with which the United States historically has shared close political, economic, and cultural ties.
The United States currently engages with Central American countries through a variety of
mechanisms, including the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade
Agreement (CAFTA-DR) and a variety of foreign assistance programs designed to promote
economic and social opportunity, ensure citizen security, strengthen democratic governance, and
secure a clean energy future. In recent months, the Obama Administration has sought closer
cooperation with Central American governments in dissuading children from making the journey
to the United States and targeting smuggling networks. It has also sought increased assistance for
Central American governments, requesting $300 million in FY2014 supplemental appropriations
to support programs designed to receive and reintegrate children and other migrants who are
repatriated to the region and to address root causes of emigration.
Congress has taken some initial steps to respond to the situation on the border, with Members
holding numerous hearings, traveling to the region, and introducing legislation. Bills were
introduced in both houses of Congress in response to the President’s supplemental appropriations
request. While S. 2648 would provide $300 million in new funding for programs in Central
America, H.R. 5230 would allow $40 million of previously appropriated assistance to be
reprogrammed to support repatriation and reintegration activities in the region. The FY2015
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations bills introduced
in both houses also include provisions to address the surge in unaccompanied children. S. 2499
would provide $100 million to address the root causes pushing children to leave Central America
and support reintegration programs, and H.R. 5013 would provide $120 million to help secure the
Mexico-Guatemala border and combat alien smuggling and human trafficking.
As Congress continues to debate legislative options to address the foreign policy dimensions of
the situation, there are a variety of interrelated issues that it might take into consideration. These
include Central American governments’ limited capacities to receive and reintegrate repatriated
children, and their inability and/or unwillingness to address the pervasive insecurity and lack of
socioeconomic opportunities in their countries that cause many children to leave. Other issues
Congress might consider include the extent to which the Mexican government is capable of
limiting the transmigration of Central Americans through its territory and how other international
actors are responding to the spike in apprehensions of unaccompanied children.
Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
U.S. Policy in Central America ........................................................................................................ 2
Background................................................................................................................................ 3
Current Policy Framework ........................................................................................................ 5
Initial Response to Surge in Unaccompanied Minors ............................................................... 7
Obama Administration’s Response ..................................................................................... 8
Congressional Action .......................................................................................................... 9
Policy Considerations .................................................................................................................... 11
Central American Capacity to Receive and Reintegrate Deportees ........................................ 11
Central American Capacity to Address Root Causes ............................................................... 14
Role of Mexico as a Transit Country ....................................................................................... 15
Selected International Efforts .................................................................................................. 18
Outlook .......................................................................................................................................... 19
Figures
Figure 1. Apprehensions of Unaccompanied Minors by Country of Origin: FY2009-FY2014 .................................................. 1
Figure 2. Map of Central America ................................................................................................... 3
Figure 3. U.S. Assistance to El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras: FY1946-FY2012 ................ 4
Tables
Table 1. U.S. Assistance to Central America: FY2013-FY2015 ...................................................... 6
Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 20
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.