Monday, March 10, 2014
Tweet[IWS] CRS: BUDGETARY AND DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS OF ADOPTING THE CHAINED CPI [7 March 2014]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
Congressional Research Service (CRS)
Budgetary and Distributional Effects of Adopting the Chained CPI
Donald J. Marples, Specialist in Public Finance
March 7, 2014
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43347.pdf
[full-text, 12 pages]
[excerpt]
This report examines the budgetary and distributional effects of using what is referred to as
the Chained Consumer Price Index (C-CPI-U or chained CPI) as the official measure of
inflation for adjusting federal revenue and spending programs for inflation.1
Several other variations of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) are currently used to make automatic
adjustments that affect both outlays and revenues. For example, the Consumer Price Index for
Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) is the basis for adjusting Social Security
benefits,2 while the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) is the basis for
adjusting personal income tax parameters to keep up with inflation.3
Concerns by many over the ability of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) to accurately measure
changes in the cost of living are long-standing.4 At issue then, as now, was a concern that the CPI
does not accurately measure changes in the cost of living. In this respect, there is a broad
consensus that the chained CPI is a more accurate measure of inflation than those
currently in use.5
Further, if adopting the chained CPI is done for technical reasons, a case can be made that the chained CPI should
be used in all cases in which the federal government attempts to mitigate the effects of inflation.
While there are concerns about the accuracy of the CPI and a general consensus that the chained
CPI is a more accurate measure of inflation, there are no current legislative proposals to adopt the
chained CPI outside of more comprehensive entitlement or budget reforms. This observation
suggests that interest in adopting the chained CPI may have less to do with improving the
technical accuracy of the measure of inflation and more to do with budgetary considerations.6
Contents
Measuring Inflation: CPI vs. Chained CPI ...................................................................................... 3
Concerns with the Traditional CPI ............................................................................................ 4
Benefits and Drawbacks with the Chained CPI ......................................................................... 5
Budgetary Effects of Adopting the Chained CPI for Inflation Adjustments .................................... 6
Distributional Effects of Adopting the Chained CPI for Inflation Adjustments .............................. 7
Concluding Observations ................................................................................................................. 9
Figures
Figure 1. Measuring Inflation Using the CPI-U and the Chained CPI ............................................ 4
Figure 2. Deficit Reduction from Adopting the Chained CPI.......................................................... 7
Tables
Table 1. Percentage Change in Federal Taxes from Switching to Chained CPI-U, by
Income Group ............................................................................................................................... 8
Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 10
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.