Wednesday, September 11, 2013
Tweet[IWS] CRS: IMMIGRATION-RELATED WORKSITE ENFORCEMENT: PERFORMANCE MEASURES [7 August 2013]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
Congressional Research Service (CRS)
Immigration-Related Worksite Enforcement: Performance Measures
Andorra Bruno, Specialist in Immigration Policy
August 7, 2013
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R40002.pdf
[full-text, 16 pages]
Summary
In 2009, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued new guidance on immigrationrelated
worksite enforcement. Under the guidelines, DHS “will use all available civil and
administrative tools, including civil fines and debarment, to penalize and deter illegal
employment.” According to 2010 estimates, there are some 8.0 million unauthorized workers in
the U.S. civilian labor force.
DHS’s U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is responsible for immigration-related
worksite enforcement, or enforcement of the prohibitions on unauthorized employment in Section
274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The INA Section 274A provisions,
sometimes referred to as employer sanctions, make it unlawful for an employer to knowingly
hire, recruit or refer for a fee, or continue to employ an alien who is not authorized to be so
employed. Today, ICE’s worksite enforcement program is focused primarily on cases that involve
critical infrastructure facilities and cases involving employers who commit “egregious violations”
of criminal statutes and engage in worker exploitation.
Employers who violate INA prohibitions on the unlawful employment of aliens may be subject to
civil monetary penalties and/or criminal penalties. Criminal investigations may result in
defendants being charged with crimes beyond unlawful employment and being subject to the
relevant penalties for those violations.
Various measures are available to examine the performance of ICE’s worksite enforcement
program. They include Final Orders for civil monetary penalties, administrative fines,
administrative arrests, criminal arrests, criminal indictments and convictions, and criminal fines
and forfeitures. In addition to examining annual changes and trends in the various performance
measure data, these data can be considered in relation to the estimated size of the unauthorized
workforce or the potential number of employers employing these workers. When considered in
this context, ICE’s worksite enforcement program can seem quite limited.
Enforcement activity by the Department of Labor (DOL) is also relevant to a discussion of
federal efforts to curtail unauthorized employment. DOL, which is responsible for enforcing
minimum wage, overtime pay, and related requirements, focuses a significant percentage of its
enforcement resources on low-wage industries that employ large numbers of immigrant—and
presumably large numbers of unauthorized—workers.
Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
DHS Enforcement ............................................................................................................................ 1
Penalties ..................................................................................................................................... 3
Civil Penalties ..................................................................................................................... 3
Criminal Penalties ............................................................................................................... 4
Program Performance ................................................................................................................ 4
Administrative Fines ........................................................................................................... 4
Administrative and Criminal Arrests ................................................................................... 6
Criminal Prosecutions and Fines ......................................................................................... 8
DOL Enforcement .......................................................................................................................... 10
Compliance Activities in Low-Wage Industries ................................................................ 11
Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 13
Tables
Table 1. Final Orders and Administrative Fines, FY1999-FY2012 ................................................. 5
Table 2. Administrative and Criminal Arrests in Worksite Enforcement Operations, FY2003-FY2012 ............................... 6
Table 3. Criminal Indictments and Convictions Related to Worksite Enforcement Investigations, FY2005-FY2012 ......................... 8
Table 4. Criminal Fines and Forfeitures Related to Worksite Enforcement Investigations, FY2003-FY2012 .................................... 9
Table 5. Cases and Back Wage Collections in Low-Wage Industries: FY2008 ............................. 12
Table 6. Cases and Back Wage Collections in Low-Wage Industries: FY2003-FY2008 .............. 12
Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 13
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.