Friday, May 03, 2013Tweet
[IWS] OECD TRADE FACILITATION INDICATORS [3 May 2013]
IWS Documented News Service
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
OECD TRADE FACILITATION INDICATORS [3 May 2013]
To help governments improve their border procedures, reduce trade costs, boost trade flows and reap greater benefits from international trade, OECD has developed a set of trade facilitation indicators that identify areas for action and enable the potential impact of reforms to be assessed.
Press Release 3 May 2013
Trade facilitation agreement would add billions to global economy, says OECD
03/05/2013 - Multilateral agreement to cut red tape in international trade would dramatically reduce trading costs and add a substantial boost to the global economy, according to new OECD research.
The OECD Trade Facilitation Indicators estimate that comprehensive implementation of all measures currently being negotiated in the World Trade Organization’s Doha Development Round would reduce total trade costs by 10% in advanced economies and by 13-15.5% in developing countries. Reducing global trade costs by 1% would increase worldwide income by more than USD $40 billion, most of which would accrue in developing countries, according to the OECD.
“Trade facilitation is about easing access to the global marketplace,” OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría said. “Complicated border processes and excess red tape raise costs, which ultimately fall on businesses, consumers and our economies. The trade facilitation negotiations offer countries a golden opportunity to reduce or eliminate these bottlenecks, cut the cost of trading, boost the flow of goods and reap greater benefits from international trade,” Mr Gurría said.
The 16 new trade facilitation indicators correspond to the main policy areas under negotiation at the WTO, including the availability of trade-related information, the simplification and harmonisation of documents, the streamlining of procedures and the use of automated processes and advance rulings.
The Indicators estimate the impact of addressing specific hurdles in the trade and border procedures in 133 countries while guiding governments as they prioritise trade facilitation actions. The Indicators also offer a roadmap for the technical assistance and capacity-building efforts needed to ensure that emerging and developing economies make the most of trading opportunities.
OECD analysis shows that trade facilitation not only benefits importers. By reducing trade costs, facilitation also helps boosts exports significantly, thus allowing firms greater participation in the global value chains that characterise international trade.
Some of the key findings of this work also include the following:
· In some African countries, revenue losses from inefficient border procedures are estimated to exceed 5% of GDP;
· Harmonising and simplifying documents would reduce trade costs by 3% for low-income countries and by 2.7% for lower middle-income countries;
· Streamlining procedures would bring further trade cost reductions of 2.8% for upper middle-income countries, 2.2% for lower middle-income countries and 1% for advanced economies;
· Automating processes would reduce trade costs by more than 2% for all countries studied;
· Ensuring the availability of trade-related information would generate cost savings of 2% for advanced economies, 1.4% for lower middle-income countries and 1.6% for low-income countries.
The OECD work on trade facilitation indicators (TFIs) was undertaken to measure the relative economic and trade impact of trade facilitation measures currently under negotiation in the World Trade Organization (WTO) on trade flows and trade costs in all WTO member countries. Individual country analyses are available here.
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
Links to this post: