Tuesday, October 30, 2012
Tweet[IWS] WordatWork: SALARY STRUCTURE POLICIES AND PRACTICES [29 October 2012]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
WorldatWork (Total Rewards Association)
SALARY STRUCTURE POLICIES AND PRACTICES [29 October 2012]
A report by WorldatWork and Deloitte Consulting LLP
October 2012
http://www.worldatwork.org/waw/adimLink?id=65885
[full-text, 40 pages]
This report summarizes the results of a July/August 2012 survey of WorldatWork members and nonmembers to gather information about current trends in salary structure policies and practices. The focus of this research is to better understand the types of salary structures as well as the designs and common practices in administration used by employers today.
Key findings and trends:
• Market-based salary structures are the most predominant type of salary structure used by survey participants (64%). While traditional and broadband structures have been more popular in the past1
• Variation in salary structure practices is infrequent, but not uncommon for organizations: , the use of traditional and broadband structures in organizations today is low in comparison (23% and 12%, respectively).
o Job level and geographic location are the most popular triggers for variation in structure type.
o Competitive positioning most frequently varies by job function and job level.
o Frequency of adjustment most commonly varies by job function and job level.
• Traditional structure range spreads appear to have increased over time and midpoint progressions have increased.
Table of Figures
Introduction 2
Types of Salary Structures 4
Figure 1: Type of Salary Structure(s) Used for U.S.-based Employees 4
Table 1: Type of Structure by Industry 5
Table 2: Type of Structure by Organization Size 5
Table 3: Range Spread and Midpoint Progression by Structure 6
Table 4: Average Range Spread by Industry by Structure Type 7
Table 5: Average Range Spread by Company Size 8
Figure 10a: Type of Variances in Global Structures 10
Competitive Positioning 11
Figure 12: Consistency of Midpoints Tied to a Single Competitive Percentile 11
Figure 13: Distribution of Midpoints Tied to a Single Competitive Percentile 12
Frequency of Adjustment 13
Figure 18: Consistency in Frequency of Adjusting Salary Ranges 13
Figure 18a: Frequency of Adjusting Salary Ranges 13
Salary Structure Tools 15
Figure 24: System(s) of Record for Salary Range Data 16
Figure 25: Type(s) of Systems/Tools Used to Communicate Salary Ranges to Internal Customers 17
Conclusion 18
Appendix 1: Tables and Figures 19
Appendix 2: Type of Salary Structure Definitions 38
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.