Thursday, May 24, 2007
Tweet[IWS] RFF: EPA & NANOTECHNOLOGY: Oversight for the 21st Century [23 May 2007]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
Resources for the Future (RFF)
EPA and Nanotechnology: Oversight for the 21st Century [23 May 2007]
http://www.nanotechproject.org/file_download/197
[full-text, 76 pages]
Press Release
RFF Scholar Considers EPA Oversight for Nanotechnology [23 May 2007]
http://www.rff.org/rff/News/Releases/2007Releases/Scholar-Considers-EPA-Oversight-For-Nanotechnology.cfm
Contact: Janet Hodur, RFF Public Affairs Manager, 202-328-5019
(WASHINGTON, May 23, 2007)
A new report by < http://www.rff.org/rff/Davies.cfm> J. Clarence (Terry) Davies, < http://www.nanotechproject.org/124> EPA and Nanotechnology: Oversight for the 21st Century, examines the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) role in nanotechnology oversight. According to EPA, nanotechnology has evolved from a futuristic idea to a current issue that needs to be addressed.
In the report, Davies considers various oversight tools for dealing with nanotechnology and proposes a number of action steps for government, industry, and other stakeholders.
According to Davies, the nanotechnology revolution provides an opportunity to institute new kinds of regulation and to create an oversight system for nanotechnology that will be more effective but less intrusive than existing forms of regulation. This approach will require fewer resources from both the public and private sectors. Nanotechnology can also be a catalyst for the revitalization of EPA.
Davies' report spells out more than 25 steps that should be taken to improve the oversight of nanotechnology. Among the recommendations made are the following:
EPA should launch its proposed voluntary program to collect nanotechnology risk information and should begin immediately to revise the Toxic Substances Control Act to better deal with nanotechnology. EPA and industry should create a joint research institute to conduct scientific research on nanotechnology effects. EPA should set up and lead an interagency regulatory coordinating group for nanotechnology oversight. Congress should establish a temporary committee in each house to consider options for a nanotechnology oversight mechanism. Congress should provide an additional $50 million each year for research on the health and environmental effects of nanotechnology products and processes. Congress should remove constraints that limit EPA's ability to require that companies collect and share necessary data and other information the agency needs to oversee nanotechnology.
Davies is a senior fellow at RFF and senior advisor to the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. Davies also wrote the report, < http://www.rff.org/rff/News/Features/Developments-in-Nanotechnology.cfm > Managing the Effects of Nanotechnology, released in January 2006 by the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. More information, including the report, can be found at < http://www.nanotechproject.org/124> .
****
(Thanks to Shirl Kennedy at Docuticker.com for tip).
______________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
Resources for the Future (RFF)
EPA and Nanotechnology: Oversight for the 21st Century [23 May 2007]
http://www.nanotechproject.org/file_download/197
[full-text, 76 pages]
Press Release
RFF Scholar Considers EPA Oversight for Nanotechnology [23 May 2007]
http://www.rff.org/rff/News/Releases/2007Releases/Scholar-Considers-EPA-Oversight-For-Nanotechnology.cfm
Contact: Janet Hodur, RFF Public Affairs Manager, 202-328-5019
(WASHINGTON, May 23, 2007)
A new report by < http://www.rff.org/rff/Davies.cfm> J. Clarence (Terry) Davies, < http://www.nanotechproject.org/124> EPA and Nanotechnology: Oversight for the 21st Century, examines the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) role in nanotechnology oversight. According to EPA, nanotechnology has evolved from a futuristic idea to a current issue that needs to be addressed.
In the report, Davies considers various oversight tools for dealing with nanotechnology and proposes a number of action steps for government, industry, and other stakeholders.
According to Davies, the nanotechnology revolution provides an opportunity to institute new kinds of regulation and to create an oversight system for nanotechnology that will be more effective but less intrusive than existing forms of regulation. This approach will require fewer resources from both the public and private sectors. Nanotechnology can also be a catalyst for the revitalization of EPA.
Davies' report spells out more than 25 steps that should be taken to improve the oversight of nanotechnology. Among the recommendations made are the following:
EPA should launch its proposed voluntary program to collect nanotechnology risk information and should begin immediately to revise the Toxic Substances Control Act to better deal with nanotechnology. EPA and industry should create a joint research institute to conduct scientific research on nanotechnology effects. EPA should set up and lead an interagency regulatory coordinating group for nanotechnology oversight. Congress should establish a temporary committee in each house to consider options for a nanotechnology oversight mechanism. Congress should provide an additional $50 million each year for research on the health and environmental effects of nanotechnology products and processes. Congress should remove constraints that limit EPA's ability to require that companies collect and share necessary data and other information the agency needs to oversee nanotechnology.
Davies is a senior fellow at RFF and senior advisor to the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. Davies also wrote the report, < http://www.rff.org/rff/News/Features/Developments-in-Nanotechnology.cfm > Managing the Effects of Nanotechnology, released in January 2006 by the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. More information, including the report, can be found at < http://www.nanotechproject.org/124> .
****
(Thanks to Shirl Kennedy at Docuticker.com for tip).
______________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************
# posted by SBasefsky : 3:45 PM
