Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Tweet[IWS] NEW ZEALAND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS PUBLICATIONS ONLINE
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
New Zealand Department of Labour
NEW ZEALAND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS PUBLICATIONS
http://www.ers.dol.govt.nz/publications/
The Department of Labour has a range of publications on employment relations, holidays and parental leave.
There are A5 booklets entitled:
- Holidays and leave - a guide for employers
[PDF 332KB] HTML - Holidays and other leave - a guide for employees
[PDF 727KB] HTML
- Parental Leave for Employees
[350KB] HTML - Parental Leave for Self-Employed
[325KB] HTML - Breastfeeding in the workplace
[PDF 303Kb] HTML - Code of Employment Practice in Infant Feeding
[PDF 133KB] HTML - Employment Relationships - Guide for Employers
[PDF, 36 pages, 332KB] HTML - Employment Rights - A Guide for Employers
[PDF, 29 pages, 460KB] HTML
There are A4 booklets entitled
- Employer's guide to employment relationships
[PDF 484KB] HTML - In good faith
[PDF 893KB] - How to Hire guide
[PDF 258KB] HTML - Disciplinary Action, Dismissal, Redundancy and Ill Health – Guide for Employees
[PDF 193KB] HTML - Disciplinary Action, Dismissal, Redundancy and Ill Health – Guide for Employers
[PDF 198KB] HTML - Transgender People at Work – Guide for Employees
[PDF 261KB] HTML - Transgender People at Work – Guide for Employers
[PDF 307KB] HTML - Using mediation services effectively
[PDF 281KB] HTML - Contemporary Mediation Practice
[PDF 603KB] HTML
Plus pamphlets about:
- Striking a Balance - A guide for working parents
[PDF 266KB] HTML - Your minimum employment rights
[PDF 600KB] HTML - Minimum pay and deductions
[PDF 394KB] HTML - Code of Ethics for Mediators
[PDF 220KB] HTML
Our other publications include:
- our very popular fact sheets
- Application forms for ER Authority
- A guide to establishing and administering unions [PDF 150KB] HTML
- Employment Cases Summary
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
****************************************
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************
[IWS] [NEW ZEALAND] LABOUR MARKET REPORTS
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
New Zealand Department of Labour
[NEW ZEALAND] LABOUR MARKET REPORTS
http://www.dol.govt.nz/publications/lmr/index.asp
The Department of Labour produces a range of reports which focus on labour market statistics and trends in New Zealand. These reports can be catergorised into two main groups:
Statistical Labour Market Reports
These reports present and analyse the latest labour market statistics.
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
****************************************
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************
[IWS] NLRB on FACEBOOK
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
NLRB on FACEBOOK
http://www.facebook.com/NLRBpage
The NLRB is an independent federal agency that administers the primary law governing relations between unions and employers in the private sector. If you're looking for the official source of information about the NLRB, please visit www.nlrb.gov
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
****************************************
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************
[IWS] BLS: EARNINGS of HEALTHCARE WORKERS by LEVEL OF DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES 2008 [21 April 2010]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
Compensation and Working Conditions
Earnings of Healthcare Workers by Level of Duties and Responsibilities, 2008 [21 April 2010]
by Miguel Lugo
http://www.bls.gov/opub/cwc/cm20100415ar01p1.htm
or
http://www.bls.gov/opub/cwc/print/cm20100415ar01p1.htm
This article presents estimates of earnings for full-time civilian healthcare practitioner and technical and healthcare support occupations, and for specific occupations within these groups, by work level. The data show significant differences between average hourly earnings of the lowest and highest work levels within most healthcare occupations.
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
****************************************
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************
[IWS] BLS: SUPPLEMENTAL PAY in the FINANCE & INSURANCE INDUSTRY [21 April 2010]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
Compensation and Working Conditions
Supplemental Pay in the Finance and Insurance Industry [21 April 2010]
by John L. Bishow
http://www.bls.gov/opub/cwc/cm20100416ar01p1.htm
or
http://www.bls.gov/opub/cwc/print/cm20100416ar01p1.htm
This article examines the use of supplemental pay in the finance and insurance industry. Pay practices in this sector are currently of particular interest.
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
****************************************
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************
[IWS] BLS: "FROZEN" DEFINED-BENEFIT PLANS--Program Perspective on [28 April 2010]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
Program Perspectives on Defined Benefit Plans
"FROZEN" DEFINED-BENEFIT PLANS
http://www.bls.gov/opub/perspectives/program_perspectives_vol2_issue3.pdf
[full-text, 4 pages]
[excerpt]
…
This issue of ProgramPerspectives focuses on defined benefit retirement plans that are
frozen.
Twenty percent of private industry workers and 79 percent of State and local government
workers participated in a defi nedbenefit retirement plan in March 2009. Defi ned benefi t plans provide
employees with guaranteed retirement benefi ts that are based on a benefi t formula. Of those
that participated in defi ned benefit plans, 19 percent of private industry workers and 10 percent
of State and local government workers were in frozen plans. The remaining 81 percent of private
industry defi ned-benefi t plan participants and 90 percent of State and local government defi nedbenefi
t plan participants were in open plans, which are active plans available to current and new employees.
...
Frequency of frozen plans
Among private industry occupational groups, the percent of employees participating in defi nedbenefi
t plans that were frozen plans ranged from 8 percent for natural resources, construction, and maintenance
occupations to 22 percent for management, professional, and related occupations. Published estimates
for workers in frozen plans are also available by employment size. Establishments employing
between 100 and 499 workers had 23 percent of workers participating in frozen plans, and workers in
establishments with fewer than 50 employees had 11 percent.
Among all private industry workers participating in defined-benefit plans, nonunion workers had a
higher percent of participants in frozen plans (24 percent) than their
union counterparts (10 percent). Also, participants in the lowest 10
percent of the earnings’ range were more likely to be in frozen plans
than participants in the top 10-percent earnings category—42 percent compared with 22 percent.
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
****************************************
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************
[IWS] RAND: THE ROLE of INCENTIVE PAYS in MILITARY COMPENSATION [28 April 2010]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
RAND
The Role of Incentive Pays in Military Compensation
JAMES HOSEK
CT-345
April 2010
Testimony presented before the Senate Armed Services Committee,
Subcommittee on Personnel on April 28, 2010
http://rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CT345/
or
http://rand.org/pubs/testimonies/2010/RAND_CT345.pdf
[full-text, 9 pages]
[excerpt]
Incentive pays help the military compete in the labor market in a cost-effective way. Rather than
increasing military pay for all, incentive pays increase military pay selectively. Incentive pays are
a means of targeting higher pay to where and when it is most needed to ensure an adequate
supply of manpower. Because incentive pays are targeted, they are less expensive than an
across-the-board increase in military pay. Some incentive pays such as sea pay or aviation
career incentive pay are highly stable additions to foundation pay. Other incentive pays such as
enlistment and reenlistment bonuses can be turned on and off as needed, and this flexibility
means that they offer a fast, well targeted, and temporary increase in pay. Similarly, deployment
related pays such as hostile fire pay and the combat zone tax exclusion are viewed as a just
recognition of special sacrifices and risk attached to deployment to a hostile area.
Incentive pays are paid to those people on the brink of enlisting or reenlisting who wouldn’t have
enlisted or reenlisted without getting these pays. But they are also paid to those who would have
enlisted or reenlisted even without the bonus. For instance, all service members who reenlist in a
specialty covered by a bonus will receive a bonus, though some would have reenlisted without a
bonus. The fact that some individuals are paid more than they need to be paid to reenlist is not
unique to military incentive pays but is a common feature of labor markets. The market-clearing
wage is the wage needed to hire or keep the worker on the margin and is higher than needed for
workers below the margin. But all workers receive the market wage because if they didn’t they
could seek work in a different market, and they have no incentive to reveal that they would accept
less than the market-clearing wage.
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
****************************************
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************
[IWS] EIRO: ADDRESSING the GENDER GAP: GOVERNMENT & SOCIAL PARTNER ACTIONS [27 April 2010]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Dublin Foundation)
European Industrial Relations Observatory (EIRO)
COMPARATIVE STUDY
Addressing the gender pay gap: Government and social partner actions [27 April 2010]
April 2010
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/studies/tn0912018s/index.htm
or
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/studies/tn0912018s/tn0912018s.htm
or
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/docs/eiro/tn0912018s/tn0912018s.pdf
[full-text, 49 pages]
Wage differentials between men and women across Europe are a major policy concern for the European Commission and the social partners. This report provides an overview of national studies on the gender pay gap, and examines the policies and actions of governments and social actors to combat pay discrimination. The report first reviews quantitative and qualitative studies on the unadjusted and adjusted pay gap and examines the many factors cited to explain the wage differentials. Then it explores specific actions carried out by governments to reduce the gender pay gap, such as legislative measures, general recommendations, monitoring procedures and suppport for low-paid occupations. It also looks at joint initiatives and collective bargaining undertaken by the social partners, as well as highlighting successful good practice examples.
The study was compiled on the basis of individual national reports submitted by the EIRO correspondents. The text of each of these national reports is available below. The reports have not been edited or approved by the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. The national reports were drawn up in response to a questionnaire and should be read in conjunction with it.
CONTENTS
Introduction
Policy background
European-level data
Adjusting the gender pay gap
National research findings
Main findings of quantitative and qualitative studies
Impact of economic crisis on gender pay gap
Government initiatives
Social partner initiatives
Women’s entrepreneurship initiatives
Good practice initiatives
Summary
Bibliography
Annex 1: Variables used for adjusting the gender pay gap in national studies
Annex 2: Country groups and codes
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
****************************************
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************
[IWS] Pew: GOVERNMENT ONLINE: The internet gives citizens new paths to government services and information [27 April 2010]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
Pew Internet & American Life Project
Government Online: The internet gives citizens new paths to government services and information
Aaron Smith, Research Specialist
April 27, 2010
http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Government_Online_2010.pdf
[full-text, 44 pages]
Summary of Findings
As government agencies at all levels bring their services online, Americans are turning in large numbers
to government websites to access information and services. Fully 82% of internet users (representing
61% of all American adults) looked for information or completed a transaction on a government website
in the twelve months preceding this survey. Some of the specific government website activities in which
Americans take part include:
• 48% of internet users have looked for information about a public policy or issue online with their
local, state or federal government
• 46% have looked up what services a government agency provides
• 41% have downloaded government forms
• 35% have researched official government documents or statistics
• 33% have renewed a driver’s license or auto registration
• 30% have gotten recreational or tourist information from a government agency
• 25% have gotten advice or information from a government agency about a health or safety issue
• 23% have gotten information about or applied for government benefits
• 19% have gotten information about how to apply for a government job
• 15% have paid a fine, such as a parking ticket
• 11% have applied for a recreational license, such as a fishing or hunting license
Throughout this report, we refer to anyone who did one or more of these activities in the preceding
twelve months as an online government user, and most of these online government users exhibit a relatively
wide range of behaviors: the typical online government user engaged in four of these activities in
the last year.
The way we ask about the use of government services has changed over the years, making direct comparisons
to our prior findings difficult. However, even accounting for these methodological changes it
is clear that going online to complete basic transactions with government (such as renewing a license
or paying a fine) is now much more commonplace than it was earlier in the decade. Conversely, online
informational activities (looking up services, downloading forms, etc.) are roughly as common within the
online population as they were the last time we asked about these activities in 2003.
In this report, we identify several other common characteristics regarding citizens’ interactions with government.
Specifically, these interactions are frequently:
• Data driven – Efforts by government agencies to post their data online are resonating with citizens.
Fully 40% of online adults went online in the preceding year to access data and information about
government (for instance, by looking up stimulus spending, political campaign contributions or the
text of legislation). These “government data users” are discussed in more detail in Part 4.
• Organized around new online platforms – Citizen interactions with government are moving beyond
the website. Nearly one third (31%) of online adults use online platforms such as blogs, social networking
sites, email, online video or text messaging to get government information. These “government
social media users” are discussed in Part 2.
• Participatory – Americans are not simply going online for data and information; they want to share
their personal views on the business of government. Nearly one quarter (23%) of internet users
participate in the online debate around government policies or issues, with much of this discussion
occurring outside of official government channels. These “online government participators” are also
discussed in more detail in Part 2 of this report.
These are among the key findings of a Pew Internet and American Life Project survey of how Americans
interact with government online. Some of the other findings from this research:
40% of online Americans have gone online for data about the business of government
Recently, many government agencies have begun making data such as agency spending, visitor logs or
political donations available to citizens as a way to encourage openness and transparency in government.
Indeed, Americans appear to have a fairly healthy appetite for such information, as 40% of internet users
took at least one of the following actions in the twelve months preceding our survey:
• 23% of online adults looked online to see how money from the recent stimulus package was being
spent
• 22% downloaded or read the text of legislation
• 16% visited a site that provides access to government data, such as data.gov, recovery.gov or usaspending.
gov
• 14% looked for information on who contributes to the campaigns of their elected officials
At least when it comes to the federal government, these government data users tend to have more positive
attitudes towards government openness and accountability. However, political ideology and partisan
affiliations tend to outweigh this effect. Specifically, Democrats (and Democratic-leaning independents)
tend to have more positive attitudes towards the federal government’s openness compared with two
years ago if they go online for government data. On the other hand, Republican voters tend to cast a
skeptical eye towards government openness whether they get this type of data online or not.
More information about government data users can be found in Part 4.
Use of government services and information online is most common among
Americans with high incomes and education levels
While many Americans interact with government using online channels, this engagement is not evenly
distributed across the online population—particularly when it comes to income and education. High-income
and well-educated internet users are much more likely than those with lower levels of income and
education to interact with government using many of the online channels we evaluated in our survey.
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
****************************************
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************
[IWS] BLS: METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT -- MARCH 2010 [28 April 2010]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT -- MARCH 2010 [28 April 2010]
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/metro.nr0.htm
or
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/metro.pdf
[full-text, 21 pages]
and
Supplemental Files Table of Contents
http://www.bls.gov/web/metro.supp.toc.htm
Unemployment rates were higher in March than a year earlier in 321 of
the 372 metropolitan areas, lower in 41 areas, and unchanged in 10
areas, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Twenty-
eight areas recorded jobless rates of at least 15.0 percent, while 3
areas registered rates below 5.0 percent. The national unemployment
rate in March was 10.2 percent, not seasonally adjusted, up from 9.0
percent a year earlier.
Metropolitan Area Unemployment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)
In March, 164 metropolitan areas reported jobless rates of at least
10.0 percent, up from 108 areas a year earlier, while 46 areas posted
rates below 7.0 percent, down from 89 areas in March 2009. Three areas
in California again registered the highest unemployment rates: El
Centro, 27.0 percent; Merced, 22.1 percent; and Yuba City, 21.7 per-
cent. Among the 28 areas with jobless rates of at least 15.0 percent,
15 were located in California and 5 were in Michigan. Houma-Bayou Cane-
Thibodaux, La., registered the lowest unemployment rate in March, 4.6
percent. Overall, 151 areas recorded unemployment rates above the U.S.
figure of 10.2 percent, 215 areas reported rates below it, and 6 areas
had rates equal to that of the nation. (See table 1.)
Farmington, N.M., again registered the largest over-the-year jobless
rate increase (+5.0 percentage points). The areas with the next largest
rate increases were Steubenville-Weirton, Ohio-W.Va. (+4.5 percentage
points) and Yuma, Ariz. (+4.1 points). Thirteen additional areas re-
corded jobless rate increases of 3.0 percentage points or more. Four
areas reported over-the-year jobless rate decreases of at least 1.0 per-
centage point in March, the largest of which was Elkhart-Goshen, Ind.
(-4.9 points).
Of the 49 metropolitan areas with a Census 2000 population of 1 million
or more, Detroit-Warren-Livonia, Mich., and Riverside-San Bernardino-
Ontario, Calif., reported the highest unemployment rates in March, 15.5
and 15.0 percent, respectively. Twenty additional large areas posted
rates of 10.0 percent or more. The large areas with the lowest jobless
rates in March were New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, La., 6.0 percent; Okla-
homa City, Okla., 6.1 percent; and Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, D.C.
-Va.-Md.-W.Va., 6.7 percent. Forty-six of the large areas registered
over-the-year unemployment rate increases, the largest of which oc-
curred in Las Vegas-Paradise, Nev. (+3.2 percentage points). The next
largest rate increases were recorded in Jacksonville, Fla. (+2.9 per-
centage points), and Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif. (+2.7
points). Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minn.-Wis., and Buffalo-
Niagara Falls, N.Y., were the only large areas to post jobless rate de-
creases over the year (-0.6 and -0.2 percentage point, respectively).
AND MUCH MORE...including TABLES....
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
****************************************
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************