Wednesday, December 03, 2014Tweet
[IWS] World Bank: WORLD DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2015: MIND, SOCIETY, AND BEHAVIOR [2 December 2014]
IWS Documented News Service
Institute for Workplace Studies-----------------Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor--------------------Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
This service is supported, in part, by donations. Please consider making a donation by following the instructions at http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/iws/news-bureau/support.html
WORLD DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2015: MIND, SOCIETY, AND BEHAVIOR [2 December 2014]
[full-text, 236 pages]
Part 1: An expanded understanding of human behavior for economic development: A conceptualframework
Part 2: Psychological and social perspectives on policy
Part 3: Improving the work of development professionals
Press Release 2 December 2014
Development Economics and Development Policy Are Due For a Redesign, Says World Bank Report
— Development policies based on new insights into how people actually think and make decisions will help governments and civil society achieve development goals more effectively. A richer and more accurate understanding of human behavior can make it easier to tackle such difficult development challenges as increasing productivity, breaking the cycle of poverty from one generation to the next, and acting on climate change, finds a new World Bank report.
examines early, exciting work that suggests ways of diagnosing and solving the psychological and social factors that influence development. The new approaches are complements to a host of other standard economic tools.
People do not always make deliberative, independent decisions based on careful self-interested calculations, the report finds. Rather, they tend to think quickly and to use mental shortcuts and shared mindsets. By factoring this in, governments and other actors can design programs that make it easier for individuals to cooperate in the pursuit of shared goals.
For instance, in an experiment in Colombia involving a modified cash transfer program, part of the funds for beneficiaries were automatically saved and then given as a lump sum at the time when researchers knew decisions about school enrollment for the next year were typically made. This adjustment, designed to encourage people to focus on schooling decisions, increased enrollments for the following year.
To inspire a fresh look at how development work is done, the report outlines three principles of human decision making: thinking automatically, thinking socially, and thinking with mental models. Much of human thinking is automatic and depends on whatever comes to mind most effortlessly. All people are deeply social and many will cooperate as long as others do too, and they are influenced by social networks and norms. Finally, most people do not invent new concepts; rather they use mental models drawn from their societies and shared histories to interpret their experiences.
Interventions need to take account of these insights and be designed through a 'learning by doing' approach. The factors and mindsets affecting decisions are local and contextual. It is hard to predict in advance which aspects of program design and implementation will drive the choices people will make.
The report applies the three principles to multiple areas, including early childhood development, productivity, household finance, health and health care, and climate change
Take the case of sugar cane farmers in India, who were asked to participate in a series of cognitive tests before and after receiving their harvest income. They did much better after the harvest, when resources were less scarce, reflecting the equivalent of an increase of roughly 10 IQ points.
Policy makers should try to move crucial decisions out of periods when mental resources are scarce. This may mean shifting school enrollment decisions to periods when poor farmers' seasonal income is higher. There may also be ways of simplifying typically complex decisions such as applying to a higher education program. These ideas apply to any initiative in which good decision making is a challenge.
Poverty in childhood, which is often accompanied by high stress and neglect from parents, can impair cognitive development, according to the report, so public programs that provide early childhood stimulation are critical. A 20-year study in Jamaica found that a program aimed at altering the way mothers interacted with their infants led to an increase in earnings by 25 percent once those children became adults, as compared to others who did not participate in the program.
The report cites several illustrative examples of innovative approaches to development, including:
· by posting stickers on buses in Kenya that encouraged passengers to complain to reckless drivers, which ultimately halved the number of insurance claims involving injury or death
· such as a lockable metal box with a passbook households used to write the name of a preventive health product, which increased savings and resulted in an increase of up to 75 percent in investment in preventive health products in Kenya
· by publicizing water consumption figures in Bogota, Colombia and naming individuals who were helping conserve water during a severe shortage, which led to citywide water savings.
· in Malawi, where a small performance incentive to encourage farmers to communicate to peers the benefits of a new agricultural technology was a cost-effective way to increase the take-up of the technology
· , like the UN's Gender Empowerment Measure or the World Bank's own Doing Business results, to motivate policymakers and firms
· like 'Scandal!', a television soap opera in South Africa that carried messages on financial literacy, which led to lower rates of gambling and better financial decision making among viewers.
The report stresses that focusing more closely on correctly defining and diagnosing problems can lead to better designed interventions. Since even experts' initial assumptions about the causes of behavior can be wrong, the implementation period should test several interventions, each based on different assumptions about choice and behavior. After adoption, the interventions' effects should inform new rounds of definition, diagnosis, design, implementation, and testing. The process of refinement should continue as interventions are scaled up.
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
Links to this post: