Thursday, November 27, 2014Tweet
[IWS] OECD: SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS & GENDER INDEX (SIGI) 2014 Edition [27 November 2014]
IWS Documented News Service
Institute for Workplace Studies-----------------Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor--------------------Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
This service is supported, in part, by donations. Please consider making a donation by following the instructions at http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/iws/news-bureau/support.html
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS & GENDER INDEX (SIGI) 2014 Edition [27 November 2014]
[full-text, 37 pages]
WHAT IS SIGI ?
The OECD Development Centre’s Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI) is a cross-country measure of discrimination against women in social institutions (formal and informal laws, social norms, and practices) across 160 countries. Discriminatory social institutions intersect across all stages of girls’ and women’s life, restricting their access to justice, rights and empowerment opportunities and undermining their agency and decision-making authority over their life choices. As underlying drivers of gender inequalities, discriminatory social institutions perpetuate gender gaps in development areas, such as education, employment and health, and hinder progress towards rights-based social transformation that benefits both women and men.
The SIGI covers five dimensions of discriminatory social institutions, spanning major socio-economic areas that affect women’s lives: discriminatory family code, restricted physical integrity, son bias, restricted resources and assets, and restricted civil liberties. The SIGI’s variables quantify discriminatory social institutions such as unequal inheritance rights, early marriage, violence against women, and unequal land and property rights. Through its 160 country profiles, country classifications and unique database, the SIGI provides a strong evidence base to more effectively address the discriminatory social institutions that hold back progress on gender equality and women’s empowerment.
Press Release 27 November 2014
2014 edition of the Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI):
Tackling the root causes of gender inequality is possible and is key to counteracting the negative domino effects of inequality throughout a woman’s life, says the OECD Development Centre
Oslo, 27/11/2014 – Countries at different levels of development have made important strides in reducing gender discrimination through promising initiatives that tackle discriminatory social norms, the results of the Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI) 2014 show. However, gaps and challenges remain across key areas affecting women’s socio-economic and political rights as well as freedom from violence, both in developing and OECD countries.
"What is not counted does not count. This is why the OECD Development Centre strives to measure discriminatory social norms and institutions. It is everyone's responsibility to change those norms and make gender equality a reality", said Federico Bonaglia, Deputy Director (a.i) of the OECD Development Centre, today, at the launch of the 2014 edition of the SIGI at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Oslo, Norway.
According to the Index, discriminatory social institutions carry a strong penalty for the socioeconomic performance and development outcomes.
For the first time since its launch in 2009, the Gender and Institutions Database underpinning the SIGI includes OECD member countries into its analysis, bringing the coverage to 160 country profiles.
Out of this coverage, 108 countries have comprehensive data that allow for comparison according to their level of discrimination in social institutions. It classifies them into five groups, from very low levels of discrimination - these include countries with robust legal frameworks and measures that provide equal rights in most of the SIGI dimensions - to very high levels of discrimination, which includes countries with discriminatory legal frameworks and customary practices across most dimensions.
Some key results from the 2014 edition include:
• Among the 108 countries for which the overall SIGI is computed, Argentina, Belgium Mongolia and Trinidad and Tobago have the lowest levels of gender inequality related to social institutions; on the other end of the spectrum, gender inequality in social institutions is a major problem in Bangladesh, Egypt, Niger and Yemen.
• Unpaid domestic responsibilities are mainly performed by women, who spend three times more of their time on unpaid domestic work than men, ranging from 1.3 times in Denmark to 10 times in Pakistan
• Violence against women is a global pandemic, perpetuated by social norms. 35% of women believe that domestic violence is justified under certain conditions, ranging from 3% in Jamaica to 92% in Guinea. 30% of women have been victims of gender-based violence in their lifetime, ranging from 7% in Canada to almost 80% in Angola.
• Women continue to be denied land rights across 102 countries through discriminatory laws or customary practices. This has a direct negative impact on their decision-making authority within their family and their economic empowerment opportunities.
• Only one out of five members of national parliaments is female.
In the lead up to the post-2015 agenda and adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals, the SIGI’s data and profiles show why a stand-alone goal on gender equality that responds to the universal challenges faced by women world-wide is critical for ensuring inclusive, rights-based sustainable development.
More information on the SIGI:
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
Links to this post: