Monday, November 17, 2014

Tweet

[IWS] ILO: SOCIAL PROTECTION GLOBAL POLICY TRENDS 2010-2015 [17 November 2014]

IWS Documented News Service

_______________________________

Institute for Workplace Studies-----------------Professor Samuel B. Bacharach

School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies

Cornell University

16 East 34th Street, 4th floor--------------------Stuart Basefsky

New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau

________________________________________________________________________

This service is supported, in part, by donations. Please consider making a donation by following the instructions at http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/iws/news-bureau/support.html ßCLICK HERE

NOTE: If this service were commercial, the typical charge would be $300 per year. It remains free because several of the relationships necessary to produce the service require it to be at least quasi-governmental and not-for-profit. If you are a consultant, publisher, lawyer, HR professional or someone who has profited from receiving this service, please chip  in. Unless a significant part of the cost can be covered by donations, this service may come to an end. All gifts are tax-deductible (for U.S. tax payers). We do not furnish personal information to others under any circumstances.
Thank you for your support!

 

International Labour Organization (ILO)

Social Protection Policy Papers No. 12

 

SOCIAL PROTECTION GLOBAL POLICY TRENDS 2010-2015: From fiscal consolidation to expanding social protection:

Key to crisis recovery, inclusive development and social justice [17 November 2014]

http://www.ilo.org/global/publications/working-papers/WCMS_319641/lang--en/index.htm

or

http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_319641.pdf

[full-text, 106 pages]

 

Abstract

This policy paper: (i) examines IMF government spending projections for 181

countries, identifying two main phases: fiscal expansion (2008-2009) and fiscal

consolidation (2010 onwards); (ii) presents the main adjustment measures considered

since 2010 and their adverse socio-economic impacts in both high income and developing

countries; (iii) analyses divergent trends in social protection across regions, focusing on

the positive expansion of social protection floors in a majority of developing countries; (iv)

reviews potential areas of fiscal space for the necessary extension of social protection

systems; and (v) presents the developmental arguments to invest in social protection in

pursuit of crisis recovery, inclusive development and social justice.

 

Press Release 17 November 2014

ILO: Developing countries opting for social protection over fiscal consolidation

An ILO report launched ahead of the meeting of Economic and Social Councils in Seoul, South Korea, points to divergent trends: while many countries are moving towards more fiscal consolidation and less social expenditures, several developing countries are boldly expanding social protection schemes.

http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/media-centre/press-releases/WCMS_319699/lang--en/index.htm

 

GENEVA – While the majority of countries around the world are expected to cut public expenditures in 2015 and beyond, others will be moving in the opposite direction to expand social protection measures, says a new policy paper by the International Labour Organization (ILO). 

According to the ILO’s “
Social protection global policy trends 2010-2015”, 120 countries will be slashing public expenditure in 2015. Of these, 86 are developing countries. The overall number is expected to rise to 131 countries in 2016. 

But while many countries are making cuts to public expenditure, most middle-income countries are boldly expanding their social protection systems, with immediate impacts on reducing poverty and inequalities, thereby contributing to their domestic demand-led growth strategies. 

“This presents a powerful development lesson,” said Isabel Ortiz, Director of the ILO Social Protection Department. “As this study shows, even in the poorest countries there are options available to expand fiscal space for social protection.” 

Countries like Argentina and South Africa have introduced universal child benefits in recent years. Others, like Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, China, Maldives, Namibia, Panama, South Africa, Swaziland and Timor-Leste, have achieved universal or nearly universal coverage of pensions. Many others have introduced social transfers for the unemployed, mothers, children and older persons. 

Some lower-income countries have also extended social protection mainly through narrowly targeted temporary safety nets with very low benefit levels. However, in many of these countries debates are underway to build more comprehensive social protection floors. 

Impact on employment, poverty and inequality


The worldwide trends towards fiscal consolidation can be expected to aggravate the employment crisis and inequality trends, the report says. In Europe, these measures have contributed to increases in poverty or social exclusion, now affecting 123 million or 24 per cent of the population of the European Union. 

In developing countries that are not investing in social protection, adjustment measures are expected to negatively affect millions of households that have been coping with fewer and lower-paying job opportunities, higher food and fuel costs, and reduced access to public services since the crisis began. 

The ILO paper – launched ahead of the meeting of Economic and Social Councils in Seoul, South Korea – builds on the 
World Social Protection Report 2014/15: Building economic recovery, inclusive development and social justice and uses the latest IMF fiscal projections from the World Economic Outlook (October 2014). 

The study analyses social protection policies between 2010 and 2015. It shows that in the first phase of the crisis (2008–09), fiscal stimulus plans were launched in about 50 countries and social protection played a strong role in the expansionary response. 

However, in the second phase of the crisis (2010 onwards), many governments in Europe and elsewhere embarked on fiscal consolidation and premature contraction of expenditures, despite the urgent need for support from vulnerable populations. 

A fifth of countries are undergoing excessive fiscal contraction, defined as cutting public expenditures below pre-crisis levels. These include countries with significant development challenges, such as Eritrea, Sudan, Yemen, Sri Lanka, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Guinea-Bissau, Guatemala and Burundi, among others. 

Adjustment measures include the elimination or reduction of food and fuel subsidies; cuts or caps on the wage bill, including for health and social care workers; narrower targeting of social protection benefits; and reforms of pension and health care systems. Governments are also considering revenue-side measures, for example increasing consumption taxes such as value added tax (VAT) on basic products that are consumed by poor households. 

“In many countries, policy responses to the global crisis have been taken behind closed doors, as technocratic solutions with limited or no consultation. This has often resulted in a lack of public ownership, civil unrest and adverse socio-economic impacts,” said Isabel Ortiz. 

“Governments, employers, workers and civil society must come together in a national dialogue to ensure a socially-responsible recovery aimed at achieving inclusive growth, social protection and social justice,” she added. 

The 
ILO Social Protection Floors Recommendation, 2012 (No. 202) reflects a consensus among governments and employers’ and workers’ organizations from 185 countries on the need to extend social security. The roll-out of social protection floors has also been endorsed by the G20 and the United Nations. 

Interviews by print, web or broadcast media can be scheduled via the ILO Department of Communication: 
newsroom@ilo.org, +4122/799-7912. 

________________________________________________________________________

This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?