Monday, September 29, 2014Tweet
[IWS] RWJF: Recommendations for Using Surveys to Measure Health Coverage Post-Reform: Lessons from Massachusetts [26 September 2014]
IWS Documented News Service
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
This service is supported, in part, by donations. Please consider making a donation by following the instructions at http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/iws/news-bureau/support.html
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF)
Recommendations for Using Surveys to Measure Health Coverage Post-Reform: Lessons from Massachusetts [26 September 2014]
[full-text, 6 pages]
Soon after the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was signed in 2010, the US Census Bureau began exploring ways of adapting surveys that measure insurance coverage to accommodate the new law, focusing on the Current Population Survey (CPS) and the American Community Survey (ACS). At the time, Massachusetts, with its ACA-like 2006 reforms, was the only place in the country with real-world experience offering coverage through an insurance exchange (or “marketplace”). So in 2011 the Census Bureau collaborated with Research Support Services (RSS) and the University of Massachusetts Center for Survey Research (CSR) to carry out a research project. Methods included expert consultation with individuals involved in the state’s implementation of health reform since 2006, focus groups (four in total) and one-on-one cognitive interviews (134 in total) with marketplace enrollees to explore how to adapt questionnaires to capture coverage obtained through the new marketplaces.
Test subjects were recruited with the help of the state marketplace (“The Massachusetts Connector”) and in most cases the enrollees’ coverage and subsidization status were known going in to the testing. The purpose of the focus groups was to flesh out general perceptions of the marketplace, terminology enrollees used for the coverage, and pathways to enrollment. The purpose of the cognitive interviews was to go through the experimental adaptations to the CPS and ACS standardized surveys to explore whether the questions on marketplace participation and subsidization were understood as intended and prompted accurate reporting. Focus groups and cognitive interviews were conducted in English and Spanish.
This brief summarizes the results of this research and outlines recommendations for measuring health insurance coverage following the introduction of marketplace plans.
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
Links to this post: