Monday, September 15, 2014Tweet
[IWS] OECD INTERIM GLOBAL ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT [15 September 2014]
IWS Documented News Service
Institute for Workplace Studies-----------------Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor--------------------Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
This service is supported, in part, by donations. Please consider making a donation by following the instructions at http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/iws/news-bureau/support.html
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
OECD INTERIM GLOBAL ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT [15 September 2014]
[full-text, 8 pages]
Press Release 15 September 2014
Global growth continuing at a moderate pace, OECD says
15/09/14-A moderate expansion is underway in most major advanced and emerging economies, but growth remains weak in the euro area, which runs the risk of prolonged stagnation if further steps are not taken to boost demand, according to the OECD’s latest Interim Economic Assessment.
While the global recovery continues at a moderate rate, the outlook is uneven across regions. Growth will be strong enough to push unemployment down further in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada. In Japan, where unemployment has already declined to low levels, the economy will grow broadly in line with its potential. China is expected to continue an orderly adjustment to still high but more sustainable growth rates. Growth in India is projected to pick up and Brazil will experience a modest rebound from recession.
Presenting the Interim Economic Assessment in Paris, OECD Deputy Secretary-General and Acting Chief Economist Rintaro Tamaki said: “The global economy is expanding unevenly, and at only a moderate rate. Trade growth therefore remains sluggish and labour market conditions in the main advanced economies are improving only gradually, with far too many people still unable to find good jobs worldwide. The continued failure to generate strong, balanced and inclusive growth underlines the urgency of undertaking ambitious reforms.”
The OECD projects that the US will grow by 2.1 per cent this year and by 3.1 per cent in 2015, while the UK is projected to grow at 3.1 per cent in 2014 and 2.8 per cent in 2015. Canadian growth is projected at 2.3 per cent this year and 2.7 per cent in 2015.
Under the continuing influence of monetary stimulation, Japan is projected to grow by 0.9 percent in 2014 and 1.1 percent in 2015.
The euro area is projected to grow at a 0.8 percent rate in 2014 and a 1.1 percent pace in 2015. Growth prospects differ widely among the major euro area economies. Germany is forecast to grow by 1.5 per cent in both 2014 and 2015, France by 0.4 per cent in 2014 and 1 per cent in 2015, while Italy will see a -0.4 per cent drop in 2014 and a gain of just 0.1 per cent in 2015.
Given the low-growth outlook and the risk that demand could be further sapped if inflation remains near zero,or even turns negative, the OECD recommends more monetary support for the euro area. Recent actions by the European Central Bank are welcome, but further measures, including quantitative easing, are warranted. Given the weakness of demand, European countries should also use the full degree of flexibility available within the EU’s fiscal rules.
While emerging economies as a group will continue to grow much faster than the advanced economies, the forecasts are similarly uneven across countries. China is expected to grow by 7.4 per cent in 2014 and 7.3 per cent in 2015. India will grow by 5.7 per cent in 2014 and 5.9 per cent in 2015. Brazil will grow by only 0.3 per cent this year, having fallen into recession in the first half of the year, and 1.4 per cent next.
With countries facing such diverging outlooks, macroeconomic policy needs are becoming increasingly diverse. “The euro area needs more vigorous monetary stimulus, while the US and the UK are rightly winding down their unconventional monetary easing,” Mr Tamaki said. “Japan still needs more quantitative easing to secure a lasting break with deflation, but must make more progress on fiscal consolidation than most other countries.”
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
Links to this post: