Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Tweet[IWS] ITUC: THE RIGHT TO STRIKE AND THE ILO: THE LEGAL FOUNDATIONS [15 April 2014]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC)
THE RIGHT TO STRIKE AND THE ILO: THE LEGAL FOUNDATIONS MARCH 2014 [15 April 2014]
http://www.ituc-csi.org/human-trade-union-rights/reports,162/the-right-to-strike-and-the-ilo
or
http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/ituc_final_brief_on_the_right_to_strike.pdf
[full-text, 122 pages]
ABSTRACT
In June 2012, the Employers’ Group brought the Committee on Application of Standards
(CAS) to a sudden, unexpected (and unprecedented) halt. Why? The Employers’ Group,
under new leadership in the CAS, decided to challenge the very existence of an international
right to strike, a right that had been recognised to exist in principle by all ILO constituents
(employers, workers and governments) for many decades. Equally as fundamental, the
Employers’ Group also challenged the competency of the ILO Committee of Experts on the
Application of Conventions and Recommendations (Committee of Experts) to interpret ILO
conventions – attempting to open a door to future challenges to other ILO conventions.
Rather than pursue the judicial options available to it under Article 37 of the ILO
Constitution, the Employers’ Group opted instead to hold hostage the ILO supervisory
system, withholding the consensus necessary to allow it to function, until the Employers’
Group’s demands were met. Such demands included a “disclaimer” to be affixed to the front
cover of the ILO Committee of Experts’ Annual Report and General Survey that would state
that the reports do not reflect the view of the tripartite constituents and therefore enjoy no
legal authority. These demands have not changed since 2012.
This brief, written by an expert legal panel, is intended to examine and rebut the central
legal arguments raised by the Employers’ Group in support of their position. It is the
authors’ hope that the arguments will inform the debate on the existence of the right to
strike in all relevant fora, including the ICJ, should that opportunity arise. The conclusion of
the analysis is that there simply is no question but that ILO Convention 87 protects an
international right to strike. Further, the ILO supervisory system, including the Committee of
Experts, has relied upon well-established methods of treaty interpretation to arrive at this
conclusion. Those methods could only lead to that conclusion. In line with its own
jurisprudence, the ICJ should give substantial deference to the observations of the
Committee of Experts. The right to strike is further buttressed by subsequent recognition of
the right to strike in international and regional treaty instruments and by the decisions of
regional and national courts; indeed, it must be concluded that the right to strike is now
recognised under customary international law.
If the Employers’ Group wishes to continue with its challenge on the right to strike, it has
two options under the ILO Constitution – to seek a referral of the matter by the ILO
Governing Body to the International Court of Justice for an Advisory Opinion (Article 37.1 of
the ILO Constitution) or agree to the establishment of an internal, independent tribunal to
provide for the expeditious determination of the “dispute or question” relating to the
interpretation of Convention 87 (Article 37.2). Failure on the part of the Employers’ Group
to agree to resolve this matter before an independent judicial body will be viewed as an
acceptance of the authors’ arguments and conclusions as correct. It will also be viewed as
illustrating the thesis of the Workers’ Group, which is that the Employers’ Group’s strategy
is to destabilise the ILO supervisory system and in so doing seek to force the adoption of
debilitating changes to fundamental labour rights.
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION: THE EMPLOYERS’ CHALLENGE TO THE RIGHT TO STRIKE ............................................... 5
A. THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL LABOUR CONFERENCE ................................................................................................ 5
B. WHAT WERE THE EMPLOYERS’ GROUP’S CENTRAL ARGUMENTS? ........................................................................... 6
C. WHY NOW? .................................................................................................................................................. 7
D. 2012-2014 .................................................................................................................................................. 9
E. THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ) .................................................................................................... 10
II. THE ICJ AND THE ILO ............................................................................................................................ 111
III. FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION AND THE RIGHT TO STRIKE ........................................................................ 13
A. FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION IN THEORY ............................................................................................................. 13
B. THE RIGHT TO STRIKE AND COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ........................................................................................... 15
IV. THE ILO AND THE RIGHT TO STRIKE ................................................................................................... 17
A. THE COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS AND THE CFA FIND THE RIGHT TO STRIKE ENSHRINED IN CONVENTION 87 ...................... 18
1. Committee of Experts .......................................................................................................................... 18
2. The Committee on Freedom of Association......................................................................................... 22
B. THE ILO CONSTITUTION................................................................................................................................. 23
1. CFA History .......................................................................................................................................... 24
2. CFA Jurisprudence ............................................................................................................................... 24
3. Commissions of Inquiry……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………26
C. THE RIGHT TO STRIKE IN SUBSEQUENT ILO INSTRUMENTS ..................................................................................... 27
V. ILO SUPERVISORY MACHINERY AND THE MANDATE TO “INTERPRET” ILO CONVENTIONS .................... 28
A. BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO THE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM ........................................................................................... 28
B. MANDATES OF ILO SUPERVISORY BODIES .......................................................................................................... 29
1. Committee of Experts .......................................................................................................................... 30
2. Conference Committee on the Application of Standards .................................................................. 331
3. Relationship Between Mandates ........................................................................................................ 34
C. INTERPRETATION OF CONVENTIONS .................................................................................................................. 35
D. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................... 39
VI. THE RIGHT TO STRIKE OUTSIDE THE ILO ............................................................................................ 40
A. UNITED NATIONS. ........................................................................................................................................ 40
1. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights ....................................................... 40
2. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ........................................................................... 44
B. EUROPEAN INSTRUMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 45
1. The European Convention on Human Rights ....................................................................................... 45
2. The European Social Charter ............................................................................................................... 53
a) Principles relating to the Right to Strike .......................................................................................................... 54
b) Scope of the Right to Strike ............................................................................................................................. 55
c) The Right to Strike and EU Law ........................................................................................................................ 57
3. The European Union ............................................................................................................................ 58
a) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights ........................................................................................................... 58
b) The ECJ/CJEU ................................................................................................................................................... 59
C. THE INTER-AMERICAN SYSTEM ........................................................................................................................ 61
D. AFRICAN COMMISSION .................................................................................................................................. 65
VII. CONVENTION 87, THE RIGHT TO STRIKE AND THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF TREATIES 66
A. THE APPLICABILITY OF THE VCLT AND ITS RULES OF INTERPRETATION ...................................................................... 68
1. Retroactivity ........................................................................................................................................ 68
2. Material Scope .................................................................................................................................... 69
3. Personal Scope .................................................................................................................................... 69
4. VCLT Rules of Interpretation as Customary International Law ........................................................... 70
5. ILO Practice ......................................................................................................................................... 71
B. APPLICATION THE VCLT TO CONVENTION 87 ..................................................................................................... 74
1. Article 31 VCLT - General Rule of Interpretation ................................................................................. 74
a) “ordinary meaning” (Article 31(1) VCLT) ......................................................................................................... 74
b) “context”(Article 31(1) VCLT) .......................................................................................................................... 79
c) “any subsequent agreement between the parties regarding the interpretation of the treaty or the
application of its provisions” (Article 31(3)(a) VCLT) ................................................................................................. 81
d) “any subsequent practice in the application of the treaty which establishes the agreement of the parties
regarding its interpretation (Article 31(3)(b) VCLT) ................................................................................................... 82
e) “any relevant rules of international law applicable in the relations between the parties” (Article 31(3)(c)
VCLT) ......................................................................................................................................................................... 83
f) “A special meaning shall be given to a term if it is established that the parties so intended” (Article 31(4)
VCLT) ......................................................................................................................................................................... 84
g) Further interpretation principles ..................................................................................................................... 85
2. Article 32 VCLT - Supplementary Means of Interpretation .................................................................. 86
a) Does the described meaning of Article 3 of C87 produce contradictory or impossible consequences or leads
to something unreasonable or absurd? .................................................................................................................... 86
b) Would the application of Article 32 VCLT change the situation?..................................................................... 87
3. Inadmissible “Creative interpretation”? .............................................................................................. 88
VIII. THE RIGHT TO STRIKE IS CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW ............................................................ 90
IX. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................................... 96
ANNEX I: CONVENTION 87 ............................................................................................................................. 98
ANNEX II: ILO SUPERVISORY MACHINERY .................................................................................................... 104
ANNEX III: VIENNA CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF TREATIES (VCLT) - RELEVANT SECTIONS ........................ 110
ANNEX IV: THE RIGHT TO STRIKE IN CONSITUTIONS OF THE WORLD ........................................................... 111
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.