Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Tweet[IWS] CRS: Concurrent Receipt of Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Unemployment Insurance (UI): Background and Legislative Proposals in the 113th Congress [9 April 2014]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
Congressional Research Service (CRS)
Concurrent Receipt of Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Unemployment Insurance (UI): Background and Legislative Proposals in the 113th Congress
William R. Morton, Analyst in Income Security
April 9, 2014
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43471.pdf
[full-text, 18 pages]
Summary
Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Unemployment Insurance (UI) are forms of
social insurance that provide protection against the risk of economic loss due to specific adverse
events. SSDI insures against the risk of lost earnings due to a severe disability by providing
monthly cash benefits to statutorily disabled workers who are unable to engage in substantial
gainful activity (SGA) and to their dependents. UI, on the other hand, protects against the risk of
lost earnings due to unemployment by providing temporary cash assistance to involuntarily
unemployed workers who meet the requirements of state law. Although the two programs serve
largely separate populations, under certain circumstances, some individuals may be concurrently
(simultaneously) eligible for SSDI and UI.
In July 2012, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report that examined the
issue of overlapping SSDI and UI benefits. GAO found that 117,000 individuals received
concurrent cash benefit payments from the SSDI and UI programs in fiscal year (FY) 2010 of
more than $850 million. These individuals represented less than 1% of the total beneficiaries in
both programs, and the cash benefits they received in FY2010 totaled 0.2% of SSDI benefit
outlays and 0.4% of UI benefit outlays.
During the 113th Congress, several bills have been introduced to eliminate or reduce the SSDI
benefits of individuals who concurrently receive UI benefits. These proposals take one of three
general approaches to offsetting or preventing concurrent receipt of benefits. The first approach
treats receipt of UI benefits as engaging in SGA, which would delay receipt of SSDI cash benefits
and Medicare for individuals awarded but not yet entitled to SSDI benefits and could lead to a
suspension of SSDI cash benefits for individuals already entitled to SSDI. The second approach
suspends SSDI cash benefits for any month in which an individual receives UI benefits. The third
approach reduces SSDI cash benefits, dollar for dollar, for any month in which an SSDI
beneficiary is in receipt of UI benefits.
Proponents of these bills argue that concurrent receipt of SSDI and UI benefits is “double
dipping” or duplicative, inasmuch as each payment serves the same function of replacing lost
earnings. They also maintain that receipt of one benefit is fundamentally contradictory with the
eligibility requirements of the other, in that UI beneficiaries are required to be able and available
for work (as determined under state law), while SSDI beneficiaries must be generally unable to
work due to a severe physical or mental impairment.
Opponents, on the other hand, argue that concurrent receipt of UI and SSDI benefits is consistent
and appropriate under law, because the SSDI program actively encourages beneficiaries to return
to work through various work incentives. Many opponents also contend that preventing or
offsetting concurrent receipt of SSDI and UI benefits discriminates against people with
disabilities who have lost their job through no fault of their own.
This report explores the issue of concurrent eligibility for the SSDI and UI programs and
examines many of the legislative proposals introduced in the 113th Congress to eliminate or
reduce concurrent receipt of SSDI and UI.
Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Social Security Disability Insurance.......................................................................................... 1
Eligibility ............................................................................................................................. 2
Benefits ............................................................................................................................... 2
Financing ............................................................................................................................. 3
Unemployment Insurance .......................................................................................................... 4
Eligibility ............................................................................................................................. 5
Benefits ............................................................................................................................... 5
Financing ............................................................................................................................. 5
Concurrent Receipt of SSDI and UI Benefits .................................................................................. 6
GAO Report on Overlapping SSDI and UI Benefits ................................................................. 8
Estimate of the Number of Concurrent SSDI and UI Beneficiaries .......................................... 9
Arguments For and Against Eliminating or Offsetting Concurrent Receipt of SSDI and UI
Benefits ....................................................................................................................................... 10
Legislative Proposals in the 113th Congress to Eliminate or Offset Concurrent Receipt
SSDI and UI Benefits ................................................................................................................. 12
H.R. 1502................................................................................................................................. 12
S. 1099 ..................................................................................................................................... 13
S.Amdt. 2631 to S. 1845 ......................................................................................................... 13
S. 1931 and S. 2097 ................................................................................................................. 14
President’s FY2015 Budget Proposal ...................................................................................... 14
Tables
Table 1. Estimated Average Monthly Number of Concurrent SSDI and UI Beneficiaries, 2014-2023 ................................................... 9
Table 2. Proposals to Eliminate or Offset Concurrent Receipt of SSDI and UI Benefits ............. 14
Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 15
Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................... 15
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.