Monday, January 27, 2014
Tweet[IWS] Dublin Foundation: QUALITY OF LIFE IN EUROPE: TRENDS 2003-2012 [27 January 2014]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Dublin Foundation)
QUALITY OF LIFE IN EUROPE: TRENDS 2003-2012 [27 January 2014]
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/htmlfiles/ef1364.htm
or
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2013/64/en/1/EF1364EN.pdf
[full-text, 114 pages]
Authors:
Grijpstra, Douwe; de Klaver, Peter; van der Graaf, Amber; Veldhuis-Van Essen, Christi; Weijnen, Tom
Summary:
Eurofound has conducted the European Quality of Life Survey EQLS) in 2003, 2007 and 2011. This report compares the results from the three waves to provide evidence of trends and change in the quality of life of Europeans over a decade. It also examines whether differences across EU Member States have narrowed or remained stable. One of its findings is that subjective well-being has remained stable across the EU as whole, but it also finds that financial strain in households has grown in the wake of the economic crisis. The report proposes a more active approach to social protection, as lower household income is a strong negative influence on quality of life, and especially so in an economic downturn
Executive summary 7
Introduction 9
The meaning of quality of life 9
Policy context 9
The European Quality of Life Survey 10
Objectives, research questions and research activities 11
Structure of the report 12
Chapter 1: Changes in subjective well-being 13
Life satisfaction and happiness 14
Changes in well-being among sociodemographic groups 18
Key findings 23
Chapter 2: Changes in living standards and deprivation 25
Policy context 26
Within-country inequality: hypotheses 26
Financial situation 27
Ability to make ends meet 28
Ability to afford everyday goods and services 30
Standard of living 31
Material deprivation by income quartile and age group 32
Material deprivation by vulnerable group 32
Key findings 33
Chapter 3: Changes in work–life balance 35
Policy context 36
Working time 36
Work–life balance 36
Key findings 42
Chapter 4: Changes in family and social life 43
Policy context 44
Satisfaction with family life 44
Satisfaction with social life 46
Household structure: hypotheses 48
Changes in satisfaction among sociodemographic groups 49
Sources of support 49
Key findings 51
Chapter 5: Changes in home, housing and local environment 53
Policy context 54
Home and housing 54
Housing security and affordability: hypotheses 59
Accommodation of vulnerable groups 59
Key findings 61
Chapter 6: Changes in health, healthcare, education and other public services 63
Policy context 64
Health and healthcare 64
Education 69
Other public services 72
Vulnerable groups and services of general interest 75
Key findings 78
Chapter 7: Changes in quality of society 79
Policy context 80
Trust in people 80
Trust in public institutions 82
Tension between social groups 83
Social tension: hypothesis 86
Key findings 88
Chapter 8: Conclusions and policy implications 89
Overall conclusions 90
Policy implications 93
References 95
Annex 1: Research methodology and background 99
Annex 2: Results tables for Chapter 1 100
Annex 3: Results tables for Chapter 4 104
Annex 4: Results tables for Chapter 6 108
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.