Wednesday, February 06, 2013

Tweet

[IWS] ILO: GEORGIA EMPLOYMENT PROTECTION LEGISLATION (EPL): A review based on ILO standards, OECD indicators and comparative labour law [December 2012]

IWS Documented News Service

_______________________________

Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach

School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies

Cornell University

16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky

New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau

________________________________________________________________________

 

ILO

EPLex in Brief No. 1

 

EMPLOYMENT PROTECTION LEGISLATION (EPL) OF GEORGIA:

A review based on ILO standards, OECD indicators and comparative labour law [December 2012]

by Angelika Muller

http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---dialogue/documents/publication/wcms_202301.pdf

[full-text, 12 pages]

 

The Labour Code of Georgia has provoked, since its adoption in 2006, controversial discussions in the

country and in the international community. On the one hand, this reform has been contested for the lack

of tripartite social dialogue, and for the extent of deregulation which reduced the labour law to 56 articles

in total. Critical comments expressed by the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the European

Union (EU) were not taken into consideration. On the other hand, the Georgian government, with support

from the World Bank, has presented this reform as a model for other countries in transition to the market

economy.

 

The objective of this note is to review the Labour Code of Georgia with specific focus on employment

protection legislation (EPL) from international and comparative perspectives. The main references used are

ILO standards, EPL indicators of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and

the labour law of selected jurisdictions.

 

The assessment of the labour law of Georgia in this note does not pretend to be comprehensive. For

instance, the regulation of freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining is not examined, as

since 2006, the ILO Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations

(CEACR) has provided extensive comments on the Labour Code of Georgia on these issues.2

 

The legal review of the Labour Code of Georgia in this note is complemented with some economic data,

such as rates of unemployment and self-employment, wages, the growth of gross domestic product (GDP)

and foreign direct investments in the country. The conjunction of legal and economic indicators is used to

attempt an assessment of the impact of the reform of 2006 on the labour market of Georgia.

 

 

________________________________________________________________________

This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.

 




Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?