Friday, January 25, 2013
Tweet[IWS] CRS: ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTERS PROGRAM: DISTRIBUTION OF FIRE GRANT FUNDING [10 January 2013]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
Congressional Research Service (CRS)
Assistance to Firefighters Program: Distribution of Fire Grant Funding
Lennard G. Kruger, Specialist in Science and Technology Policy
January 10, 2013
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/RL32341.pdf
[full-text, 21 pages]
Summary
The Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) Program, also known as fire grants or the FIRE Act
grant program, was established by Title XVII of the FY2001 National Defense Authorization Act
(P.L. 106-398). Currently administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the program provides federal grants directly to local
fire departments and unaffiliated Emergency Medical Services (EMS) organizations to help
address a variety of equipment, training, and other firefighter-related and EMS needs. A related
program is the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Firefighters (SAFER)
program, which provides grants for hiring, recruiting, and retaining firefighters.
The fire grant program is now in its 13th year. The Fire Act statute was reauthorized in 2012 (Title
XVIII of P.L. 112-239) and provides new guidelines on how fire grant money should be
distributed. There is no set geographical formula for the distribution of fire grants—fire
departments throughout the nation apply, and award decisions are made by a peer panel based on
the merits of the application and the needs of the community. However, the law does require that
fire grants be distributed to a diverse mix of fire departments, with respect to type of department
(paid, volunteer, or combination), geographic location, and type of community served (e.g.,
urban, suburban, or rural).
For FY2012, P.L. 112-74, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, provided $675 million for
firefighter assistance, including $337.5 million for AFG and $337.5 million for SAFER. The
Administration’s FY2013 budget proposed $670 million for firefighter assistance, including $335
million for AFG and $335 million for SAFER. The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2013
(P.L. 112-175), funds firefighter assistance programs through the first six months of FY2013 at an
increase of 0.612% of the FY2012 level. Therefore, under the FY2013 continuing resolution,
AFG is funded at $339.5 million and SAFER is funded at $339.5 million through March 2013.
The 113th Congress will likely consider FY2013 and FY2014 budget appropriations for AFG and
SAFER. As is the case with many federal programs, concerns over the federal budget deficit
could impact budget levels for AFG and SAFER. At the same time, firefighter assistance budgets
will likely receive heightened scrutiny from the fire community, given the local budgetary
cutbacks that many fire departments are facing.
Contents
Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program ........................................................................................ 1
Fire Grants Reauthorization Act of 2012 ................................................................................... 1
Appropriations ........................................................................................................................... 4
FY2011 ................................................................................................................................ 5
FY2012 ................................................................................................................................ 6
FY2013 ................................................................................................................................ 7
Fire Station Construction Grants in the ARRA ................................................................................ 8
SAFER Grants ................................................................................................................................. 9
Program Evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 9
Reports Mandated by Fire Grants Reauthorization Act of 2012 ............................................. 10
Distribution of Fire Grants ............................................................................................................. 11
Issues in the 113th Congress ........................................................................................................... 12
Tables
Table 1. Key Provisions of Fire Grant Reauthorization ................................................................... 2
Table 2. Appropriations for Firefighter Assistance, FY2001-FY2013 ............................................. 4
Table 3. Recent and Proposed Appropriations for Firefighter Assistance ....................................... 5
Table 4. State-by-State Distribution of AFG Grants, FY2001-FY2011 ......................................... 13
Table 5. State-by-State Distribution of SAFER Grants, FY2005-FY2010 .................................... 15
Table 6. Requests and Awards for AFG Funding, FY2010 ............................................................ 17
Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 18
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
