Wednesday, December 02, 2009
Tweet[IWS] METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT -- OCTOBER 2009 [2 December 2009]
IWS Documented News Service
_______________________________
Institute for Workplace Studies----------------- Professor Samuel B. Bacharach
School of Industrial & Labor Relations-------- Director, Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell University
16 East 34th Street, 4th floor---------------------- Stuart Basefsky
New York, NY 10016 -------------------------------Director, IWS News Bureau
________________________________________________________________________
METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT -- OCTOBER 2009 [2 December 2009]
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/metro.nr0.htm
or
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/metro.pdf
[full-text, 21 pages]
and
Supplemental Files Table of Contents
http://www.bls.gov/web/metro.supp.toc.htm
Unemployment rates were higher in October than a year earlier in all
372 metropolitan areas, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported
today. Fifteen areas recorded jobless rates of at least 15.0 percent,
while 13 areas registered rates below 5.0 percent. The national unem-
ployment rate in October was 9.5 percent, not seasonally adjusted, up
from 6.1 percent a year earlier. Among the 369 metropolitan areas for
which nonfarm payroll employment were available, 361 areas reported
over-the-year decreases in employment and 8 reported increases.
Metropolitan Area Unemployment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)
In October, 124 metropolitan areas reported jobless rates of at least
10.0 percent, up from 13 areas a year earlier, while 75 areas posted
rates below 7.0 percent, down from 280 areas in October 2008. El Centro,
Calif., and neighboring Yuma, Ariz., continued to record the highest
unemployment rates, 30.0 and 23.5 percent, respectively. Among the 15
areas with jobless rates of at least 15.0 percent, 9 were located in
California and 3 were in Michigan. Bismarck, N.D., registered the low-
est unemployment rate in October, 2.8 percent, followed by Fargo, N.D.-
Minn., and Grand Forks, N.D.-Minn., 3.5 percent each. Overall, 138
areas recorded unemployment rates above the U.S. figure of 9.5 percent,
229 areas reported rates below it, and 5 areas had the same rate.
(See table 1.)
Detroit-Warren-Livonia, Mich., recorded the largest jobless rate in-
crease from October 2008 (+7.3 percentage points), followed by Rock-
ford, Ill. (+6.2 points). An additional 3 areas registered unemploy-
ment rate increases of 6.0 percentage points or more, and another 26
areas had increases of 5.0 to 5.9 points. While no metropolitan area
posted an unemployment rate decrease, five areas reported rate in-
creases of less than a full percentage point, the smallest of which
was in Manhattan, Kan. (+0.5 point).
Of the 49 metropolitan areas with a Census 2000 population of 1 million
or more, Detroit-Warren-Livonia, Mich., reported the highest unemploy-
ment rate in October, 16.7 percent. The large areas with the next high-
est rates were Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif., 14.6 percent,
and Las Vegas-Paradise, Nev., 13.0 percent. Fifteen additional large
areas posted rates of 10.0 percent or more. The large areas with the
lowest jobless rates in October were Washington-Arlington-Alexandria,
D.C.-Va.-Md.-W.Va., 6.2 percent, and Oklahoma City, Okla., and Virginia
Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, Va.-N.C., 6.5 percent each. All 49 large
areas registered over-the-year unemployment rate increases of at least
1.5 percentage points. Detroit-Warren-Livonia, Mich., had the largest
jobless rate increase from a year earlier (+7.3 percentage points). The
next largest rate increases occurred in Las Vegas-Paradise, Nev., and
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif. (+5.2 percentage points each),
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif. (+5.1 points), and Birmingham-
Hoover, Ala. (+5.0 points).
AND MUCH MORE...including TABLES....
________________________________________________________________________
This information is provided to subscribers, friends, faculty, students and alumni of the School of Industrial & Labor Relations (ILR). It is a service of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in New York City. Stuart Basefsky is responsible for the selection of the contents which is intended to keep researchers, companies, workers, and governments aware of the latest information related to ILR disciplines as it becomes available for the purposes of research, understanding and debate. The content does not reflect the opinions or positions of Cornell University, the School of Industrial & Labor Relations, or that of Mr. Basefsky and should not be construed as such. The service is unique in that it provides the original source documentation, via links, behind the news and research of the day. Use of the information provided is unrestricted. However, it is requested that users acknowledge that the information was found via the IWS Documented News Service.
****************************************
Stuart Basefsky
Director, IWS News Bureau
Institute for Workplace Studies
Cornell/ILR School
16 E. 34th Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (607) 255-2703
Fax: (607) 255-9641
E-mail: smb6@cornell.edu
****************************************